Notable Performance

The device scored an outstanding 169 points in video performance, making it the best Android smartphone for movie recording according to DxOMark. The testers praised its very stable image stabilization, reliable exposure settings, wide dynamic range, and realistic skin tones. In still photography, it achieved 171 points, narrowly trailing behind the X200 Ultra.

Strengths and Weaknesses

The new model excels in telephoto photography, zoom quality, bokeh rendering, and performance in low light conditions. However, there are a few areas for improvement: contrast issues appear in some HDR situations, the ultra-wide-angle lens captures relatively narrow shots, and occasional artifacts such as ghosting or color fringing can occur. In very dark scenes, some images may look overly edited, with darker skin tones appearing lighter.

Despite these points, the Vivo X300 Pro demonstrates impressive overall performance and makes a strong statement at year’s end. It’s particularly appealing to users seeking top-notch video quality outside of Apple’s ecosystem.

The post Vivo X300 Pro Ranks Second in DxOMark with Strong Camera appeared first on Huawei NewOS.

Camera Performance

The X300 Pro earns a total score of 171 points for photography and an impressive 169 points for video, making it one of the strongest non-Apple options available. Vivo’s latest flagship excels in areas such as telephoto shots, zoom capabilities, bokeh effects, and low-light performance.

Advantages and Limitations

The phone stands out with stable exposure, a good dynamic range, mostly accurate white balance, and consistent skin tones in both photos and videos. Video stabilization is another area where the X300 Pro shines.

However, there are some drawbacks too. The review points to contrast issues in certain HDR scenes, a relatively narrow ultra-wide camera, and occasional artifacts like ghosting or color fringing. In low light conditions, images can sometimes look over-processed, with darker skin tones appearing slightly brighter than intended.

Overall, the Vivo X300 Pro delivers strong performance across both photography and videography categories.

The post Vivo X300 Pro Secures Second Place in DxOMark Camera Test appeared first on Huawei NewOS.

Performance:

The Vivo X300 Pro is equipped with the MediaTek Dimensity 9500 processor and runs Android 16 alongside Origin OS 6. It offers up to 12GB of RAM and up to 1TB of UFS 4.0 storage space. Conversely, the Huawei Pura 80 Ultra boasts a HiSilicon Kirin 9020 processor and HarmonyOS 5.1, featuring up to 16GB of RAM and up to 1TB of internal storage. For those seeking peak performance, the Vivo X300 Pro’s more powerful chipset makes it an excellent choice.

Camera Setup:

The rear camera setup on the Vivo X300 Pro includes a 50MP main sensor, a 200MP periscope telephoto lens with 3.7X optical zoom, and a 50MP ultra-wide-angle camera. Meanwhile, the front features a single 50MP selfie camera. The Huawei Pura 80 Ultra, however, offers a slightly different configuration: it has a 50MP main camera, a 50MP periscope telephoto lens, an additional 12.5MP periscope telephoto lens with 9.4X optical zoom, and a 40MP ultra-wide-angle camera but only includes a 13MP front-facing camera. If versatility is key, the Huawei Pura 80 Ultra could be more appealing; however, for those prioritizing high-resolution selfies, the Vivo X300 Pro stands out.

Display and Durability:

The Vivo X300 Pro features a stunning 6.78-inch 1.5K LTPO AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate, capable of reaching peak brightness levels of up to 4500 nits. In comparison, the Huawei Pura 80 Ultra comes with a slightly smaller but equally impressive 6.8-inch LTPO OLED screen that also boasts a 120Hz refresh rate and a maximum brightness of 3000 nits. For those who value brightness, the Vivo X300 Pro offers superior performance; however, if durability is your top priority, the Huawei Pura 80 Ultra provides enhanced ruggedness.

Battery Pack and Charging Speed:

The Vivo X300 Pro packs a robust 6510 mAh battery that supports fast charging at speeds of up to 90W along with wireless charging capabilities reaching 40W. The Huawei Pura 80 Ultra, on the other hand, features a slightly smaller 5700 mAh battery but offers faster wired charging at 100W and wireless charging at 80W. If quick charging is essential to you, then the Huawei Pura 80 Ultra would be the better option.

In summary, both smartphones offer unique strengths that cater to different user preferences. The Vivo X300 Pro excels in powerful performance and high-resolution selfies, while the Huawei Pura 80 Ultra shines with its versatile camera setup and rapid charging capabilities.

The post Vivo X300 Pro vs Huawei Pura 80 Ultra – A Detailed Comparison appeared first on Huawei NewOS.