Why I Still Prefer Gemini Over Apple Intelligence After a Year of Testing

After a year of closely following Apple’s foray into artificial intelligence with Apple Intelligence, I’m still choosing Google’s Gemini. While Apple initially seemed poised to challenge Google’s dominance, the reality has been a series of underwhelming features and missed opportunities.

Image Generation Discrepancies: Apple’s Playground (formerly Image Playground) struggles to deliver realistic or desirable results, often producing “creepy” animated characters. Google’s Pixel Studio, while not allowing the use of specific likenesses, has significantly improved, offering a more enjoyable creative experience. The same holds true for image editing: Apple’s Clean Up tool is mediocre compared to Google’s Magic Editor and Help Me Edit, which provide more robust features and fewer artifacts.

Copycat Calling Features Lag Behind: Apple’s attempts at features like Hold Assist Detection and Call Screening are functional but noticeably behind Google’s offerings. The long development timeline for features like Call Screening, coupled with less stringent filters, highlight the gap.

Siri’s Unrealized Potential: Apple’s promises of a conversational Siri, with features like on-screen context and cross-app functionality, remain unfulfilled. While Google has actively introduced features like Magic Cue and expanded Gemini Live support, Apple’s AI vision feels incomplete. Circle to Search, a Gemini feature, also outperforms Apple’s Visual Intelligence in functionality and responsiveness.

While Apple is making progress, the delayed release and less-polished execution of its AI features have solidified my preference for Google’s Gemini. The promise of a more capable Siri and advanced AI tools remains, but for now, Google holds a clear lead.

Related: Google’s Magic Editor, Apple’s Clean Up, Gemini Live