Vivo X300 Pro Secures Second Place in DxOMark Camera Test

Vivo's latest flagship excels in photography and videography.

Vivo’s latest flagship, the X300 Pro, has secured second place in DxOMark’s camera test, just behind Huawei’s Pura 80 Ultra. This achievement marks a significant improvement over Vivo’s previous best result with the X200 Ultra.

📌 Key Takeaways

✓The Vivo X300 Pro ranks second overall in the DxOMark camera test.
✓Scores of 171 for photography and 169 for video highlight its strengths.
✓It excels in telephoto shots, zoom, bokeh, and low-light conditions.
✓Video stabilization is particularly strong.

Camera Performance

The X300 Pro earns a total score of 171 points for photography and an impressive 169 points for video, making it one of the strongest non-Apple options available. Vivo’s latest flagship excels in areas such as telephoto shots, zoom capabilities, bokeh effects, and low-light performance.

Advantages and Limitations

The phone stands out with stable exposure, a good dynamic range, mostly accurate white balance, and consistent skin tones in both photos and videos. Video stabilization is another area where the X300 Pro shines.

However, there are some drawbacks too. The review points to contrast issues in certain HDR scenes, a relatively narrow ultra-wide camera, and occasional artifacts like ghosting or color fringing. In low light conditions, images can sometimes look over-processed, with darker skin tones appearing slightly brighter than intended.

Overall, the Vivo X300 Pro delivers strong performance across both photography and videography categories.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

How does the Vivo X300 Pro perform compared to other flagships?

The Vivo X300 Pro ranks ahead of several high-profile flagships like the Oppo Find X8 Ultra and Apple’s iPhone 17 Pro, but it falls behind Huawei’s Pura 80 Ultra.

What are some weaknesses noted in the DxOMark review?

The Vivo X300 Pro has contrast issues in HDR scenes, a narrow ultra-wide camera angle, occasional artifacts like ghosting or color fringing, and sometimes over-processed images in low light.